PatchFirst · Свежие уязвимости
За последние 30 дней в PHP опубликовано уязвимостей: 222; в каталоге KEV: 2.
Свежие сообщения об уязвимостях из анонсов разработчиков и новостей безопасности. Предупреждения не меняют рейтинг защищённости.
По данным OpenNet, в PHP найдена уязвимость — удалённое выполнение кода (CVE-2026-115560). Точные затронутые версии не указаны. Версия с исправлением в сообщении не указана.
Что сделать сейчас: Проверьте, вышло ли обновление PHP с исправлением, и установите его.
CVE-2026-115560
Уязвимостей: 7239
A potential hostname injection vulnerability has been found which could allow attackers to alter url resolution. If a request contains the X-Forwarded-Host HTTP header a website would then use its value in place of the actual HTTP hostname. In cases where caching is enabled, this could allow an attacker to potentially embed a remote url as the base_url for any site. This would then cause other visitors to the site to be redirected unknowingly. This header is necessary for servers running behind a reverse proxy (such as nginx). Such servers are likely not vulnerable to this risk. A fix has been merged into the default installer, although ex
A low level XSS vulnerability has been found in the Framework affecting http redirection via the Director::force_redirect method. Attempts to redirect to a url may generate HTML which is not safely escaped, and may pose a risk of XSS in some environments. This vulnerability is marked low as it is difficult to exploit, as any injected HTML will only be returned from the server if the Location HTTP header is also sent, meaning that any user browsing the site would not be exposed to the body of the response before their browser redirects them.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been discovered in the FormAction field where a user-specified title may be specified.
A high level XSS vulnerability has been discovered in the SilverStripe framework which causes links containing hash anchors (E.g. href="#anchor") to be rewritten in an unsafe way. The rewriteHashlinks option on SSViewer will rewrite these to contain the current url, although without adequate escaping, meaning that HTML could be injected via injecting unsafe values to any page via the querystring. Due to the nature of this issue it is likely that a large number of SilverStripe sites are affected.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been discovered in the print view of GridField. This vulnerability can only be exploited if a user with CMS access has posted malicious or unescaped HTML into any field of an object in a GridField, and the print feature is used. This has been resolved by ensuring that the print feature safely escapes all fields.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been discovered in the TreeDropdownField and TreeMultiSelectField. This vulnerability can only be exploited if a user with CMS access has posted malicious or unescaped HTML into any of the dataobjects used as a data source for either of these fields. This has been resolved by ensuring that all dataobjects used as a data source have their content safely encoded.
A low level vulnerability has been found in the SilverStripe framework, where the Quadratic Blowup Attack could potentially be exploited to affect the performance of a site. See http://mashable.com/2014/08/06/wordpress-xml-blowup-dos/ for a writeup.
Non IE browsers don’t appear to be affected, but I haven’t tested a wide range of browsers to be sure Requests that come through from IE do NOT appear to encode all entities in the URL string, meaning they are inserted into output content directly by SSViewer::process() when rewriting hashlinks, as it directly outputs $_SERVER[‘REQUEST_URI’] **Example IE8 request** 127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:13:42 +1000] “GET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\”onmouseover=\”alert(‘things’);\” HTTP/1.1” 200 **Example FF request** 127.0.0.1 - - [18/Jun/2014:14:14:22 +1000] “GET /site/cars/brands/toyota?one=1\%22onmouseover=\%22alert(%27things%27);\%22 HTTP/
A number of form actions in the Forum module are directly accessible. A malicious user (e.g. spammer) can use GET requests to create Members and post to forums, bypassing CSRF and anti-spam measures. Additionally, a forum moderator could be tricked into clicking a specially crafted URL, resulting in a topic being moved. Thanks to Michael Strong for discovering.
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /Cover/Show route (showAction in CoverController.php) in Open Library Foundation VuFind 2.4 through 9.1 before 9.1.1 allows remote attackers to access internal HTTP servers and perform Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by proxying arbitrary URLs via the proxy GET parameter.
A vulnerability exists in the permission validation for SiteTree object creation. By default user permissions are not validated by the SiteTree::canCreate method, unless overridden by user code or via the configuration system. This vulnerability will allow users, or unauthenticated guests, to create new SiteTree objects in the database. This vulnerability is present when such users are given CMS access via other means, or if there is another mechanism (such as RestfulServer module) which allows model editing and relies on model-level permission checks. This vulnerability is restricted to the creation of draft or live pages, and does not all
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /Upgrade/FixConfig route in Open Library Foundation VuFind 2.0 through 9.1 before 9.1.1 allows a remote attacker to overwrite local configuration files to gain access to the administrator panel and achieve Remote Code Execution. A mitigating factor is that it requires the allow_url_include PHP runtime setting to be on, which is off in default installations. It also requires the /Upgrade route to be exposed, which is exposed by default after installing VuFind, and is recommended to be disabled by setting autoConfigure to false in config.ini.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been discovered in the VirtualPage class. This vulnerability can only be exploited if a user with CMS access has posted malicious or unescaped HTML into any of the textfields of a page which a VirtualPage refers to. This has been resolved by ensuring that VirtualPage safely escapes all field content.
A cross-site scripting vulnerability has been discovered in the CMS page history tab. This vulnerability can only be exploited if a user with CMS access has posted malicious or unescaped HTML into any of the text fields on a page, and if the "compare mode" option is selected. The HTML will be embedded into the page unescaped. This has been resolved by performing the text comparison in a HTML friendly way.
It is possible for a bad actor with access to the CMS to make use of onmouseover or onmouseout attributes in the WYSIWYG editor to embed malicious javascript.
Under certain circumstances it is possible to execute an authorized foreign code in Shopware version prior to 5.2.25.
Under certain circumstances, it’s possible to execute an unauthorized foreign code in Shopware in versions prior to 5.2.16. One possible threat is if a template that doesn’t derive from the Shopware standard has been completely copied. Themes or plugins that execute or overwrite the following template code are vulnerable. - Affected file: emotion.tpl Path template file "Emotion template": templates / _default / frontend / forms / elements.tpl Path template file "Responsive template": themes/Frontend/Bare/frontend/forms/elements.tpl The complete line beginning with: `{eval var=$sSupport.sFields[$sKey]...` should be exchanged with the follow
A non-persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Shopware eCommerce platform within the frontend. This vulnerability may allow an attacker to inject and execute malicious scripts in the context of a victim's web browser.
Under certain circumstances, it’s possible to execute an unauthorized foreign code in Shopware. This is a critical security vulnerability that could affect the entire system. All Shopware versions including Shopware 5.2.14 are affected.
Versions of sensiolabs/connect prior to 4.2.3 are affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability due to the absence of the state parameter in OAuth requests. The lack of proper state parameter handling exposes applications to CSRF attacks during the OAuth authentication flow.
Сопоставьте установленный стек и версии со свежими базами уязвимостей.