p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Свежие уязвимости

Уязвимости wolfssl · Страница 6

За последние 30 дней в wolfssl опубликовано уязвимостей: 1; в каталоге KEV: 0.

Фильтры уязвимостей
Сбросить фильтры

Уязвимостей: 145

  1. CVE-2024-0901

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 0,69%Нет опубликованного исправления

    SEGV and out of bounds memory read from malicious packet

    Remotely executed SEGV and out of bounds read allows malicious packet sender to crash or cause an out of bounds read via sending a malformed packet with the correct length.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  2. CVE-2023-6936

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,6%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Heap-buffer over-read with WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS

    In wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging).

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  3. CVE-2023-6937

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,51%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Improper (D)TLS key boundary enforcement

    wolfSSL prior to 5.6.6 did not check that messages in one (D)TLS record do not span key boundaries. As a result, it was possible to combine (D)TLS messages using different keys into one (D)TLS record. The most extreme edge case is that, in (D)TLS 1.3, it was possible that an unencrypted (D)TLS 1.3 record from the server containing first a ServerHello message and then the rest of the first server flight would be accepted by a wolfSSL client. In (D)TLS 1.3 the handshake is encrypted after the ServerHello but a wolfSSL client would accept an unencrypted flight from the server. This does not compromise key negotiation and authentication so it is

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  4. CVE-2023-6935

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,54%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Marvin Attack vulnerability in SP Math All RSA

    wolfSSL SP Math All RSA implementation is vulnerable to the Marvin Attack, new variation of a timing Bleichenbacher style attack, when built with the following options to configure: --enable-all CFLAGS="-DWOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA" The define “WOLFSSL_STATIC_RSA” enables static RSA cipher suites, which is not recommended, and has been disabled by default since wolfSSL 3.6.6.  Therefore the default build since 3.6.6, even with "--enable-all", is not vulnerable to the Marvin Attack. The vulnerability is specific to static RSA cipher suites, and expected to be padding-independent. The vulnerability allows an attacker to decrypt ciphertexts and forge

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  5. CVE-2023-3724

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,65%Нет опубликованного исправления

    TLS 1.3 client issue handling malicious server when not including a KSE and PSK extension

    If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a potentially known IKM value when generating the session master secret key compromises the key generated, allowing an eavesdropper to reconstruct it and potentially allowing access to or meddling with message contents in the session. This issue does not affect client validation of connected servers, nor expose private key information, but could result in an insecure TLS 1.3 sessi

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  6. CVE-2022-42905

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 2,08%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-42905

    In wolfSSL before 5.5.2, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS 1.3 client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes. (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging.)

  7. CVE-2022-42961

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,66%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-42961

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. A fault injection attack on RAM via Rowhammer leads to ECDSA key disclosure. Users performing signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, might leak faulty ECC signatures. These signatures can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery. (In 5.5.0 and later, WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS can be used to address the vulnerability.)

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  8. CVE-2022-39173

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 5,76%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-39173

    In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  9. CVE-2021-44718

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,79%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2021-44718

    wolfSSL through 5.0.0 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service and infinite loop in the client component by sending crafted traffic from a Machine-in-the-Middle (MITM) position. The root cause is that the client module accepts TLS messages that normally are only sent to TLS servers.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  10. CVE-2022-38153

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 2,48%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-38153

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0 (when --enable-session-ticket is used); however, only version 5.3.0 is exploitable. Man-in-the-middle attackers or a malicious server can crash TLS 1.2 clients during a handshake. If an attacker injects a large ticket (more than 256 bytes) into a NewSessionTicket message in a TLS 1.2 handshake, and the client has a non-empty session cache, the session cache frees a pointer that points to unallocated memory, causing the client to crash with a "free(): invalid pointer" message. NOTE: It is likely that this is also exploitable during TLS 1.3 handshakes between a client and a malicious server. With

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  11. CVE-2022-38152

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 2,92%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-38152

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. When a TLS 1.3 client connects to a wolfSSL server and SSL_clear is called on its session, the server crashes with a segmentation fault. This occurs in the second session, which is created through TLS session resumption and reuses the initial struct WOLFSSL. If the server reuses the previous session structure (struct WOLFSSL) by calling wolfSSL_clear(WOLFSSL* ssl) on it, the next received Client Hello (that resumes the previous session) crashes the server. Note that this bug is only triggered when resuming sessions using TLS session resumption. Only servers that use wolfSSL_clear instead of the

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  12. CVE-2022-34293

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 1,44%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-34293

    wolfSSL before 5.4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via DTLS because a check for return-routability can be skipped.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  13. CVE-2022-25640

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 1,35%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-25640

    In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, a TLS 1.3 server cannot properly enforce a requirement for mutual authentication. A client can simply omit the certificate_verify message from the handshake, and never present a certificate.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  14. CVE-2022-25638

    Средний · CVSS 6.5EPSS 0,63%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-25638

    In wolfSSL before 5.2.0, certificate validation may be bypassed during attempted authentication by a TLS 1.3 client to a TLS 1.3 server. This occurs when the sig_algo field differs between the certificate_verify message and the certificate message.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  15. CVE-2022-23408

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 1,38%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-23408

    wolfSSL 5.x before 5.1.1 uses non-random IV values in certain situations. This affects connections (without AEAD) using AES-CBC or DES3 with TLS 1.1 or 1.2 or DTLS 1.1 or 1.2. This occurs because of misplaced memory initialization in BuildMessage in internal.c.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  16. CVE-2021-38597

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,48%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2021-38597

    wolfSSL before 4.8.1 incorrectly skips OCSP verification in certain situations of irrelevant response data that contains the NoCheck extension.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  17. CVE-2021-37155

    Критический · CVSS 9.8EPSS 1,49%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2021-37155

    wolfSSL 4.6.x through 4.7.x before 4.8.0 does not produce a failure outcome when the serial number in an OCSP request differs from the serial number in the OCSP response.

  18. CVE-2021-24116

    Средний · CVSS 4.9EPSS 1,19%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2021-24116

    In wolfSSL through 4.6.0, a side-channel vulnerability in base64 PEM file decoding allows system-level (administrator) attackers to obtain information about secret RSA keys via a controlled-channel and side-channel attack on software running in isolated environments that can be single stepped, especially Intel SGX.

  19. CVE-2021-3336

    Высокий · CVSS 8.1EPSS 0,8%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2021-3336

    DoTls13CertificateVerify in tls13.c in wolfSSL before 4.7.0 does not cease processing for certain anomalous peer behavior (sending an ED22519, ED448, ECC, or RSA signature without the corresponding certificate). The client side is affected because man-in-the-middle attackers can impersonate TLS 1.3 servers.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  20. CVE-2020-36177

    Критический · CVSS 9.8EPSS 3,57%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2020-36177

    RsaPad_PSS in wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in wolfSSL before 4.6.0 has an out-of-bounds write for certain relationships between key size and digest size.

    Опубликовано Обновлено

Проверьте свой сервер

Сопоставьте установленный стек и версии со свежими базами уязвимостей.

Проверьте свой сервер →