p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Свежие уязвимости

Уязвимости wolfssl · Страница 5

За последние 30 дней в wolfssl опубликовано уязвимостей: 1; в каталоге KEV: 0.

Фильтры уязвимостей
Сбросить фильтры

Уязвимостей: 108

  1. CVE-2025-11933

    Низкий · CVSS 2.3EPSS 0,45%Нет опубликованного исправления

    DoS Vulnerability in wolfSSL TLS 1.3 CKS Extension

    Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  2. CVE-2025-11934

    Низкий · CVSS 2.1EPSS 0,17%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Improper Validation of Signature Algorithm Used in TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify

    Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously could respond as ECDSA P256 being the accepted signature algorithm and the connection would continue with using ECDSA P256, if the client supports ECDSA P256.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  3. CVE-2025-11935

    Средний · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,23%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Forward Secrecy Violation in WolfSSL TLS 1.3

    With TLS 1.3 pre-shared key (PSK) a malicious or faulty server could ignore the request for PFS (perfect forward secrecy) and the client would continue on with the connection using PSK without PFS. This happened when a server responded to a ClientHello containing psk_dhe_ke without a key_share extension. The re-use of an authenticated PSK connection that on the clients side unexpectedly did not have PFS, reduces the security of the connection.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  4. CVE-2025-7396

    Средний · CVSS 5.6EPSS 0,22%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Curve25519 Blinding

    In wolfSSL release 5.8.2 blinding support is turned on by default for Curve25519 in applicable builds. The blinding configure option is only for the base C implementation of Curve25519. It is not needed, or available with; ARM assembly builds, Intel assembly builds, and the small Curve25519 feature. While the side-channel attack on extracting a private key would be very difficult to execute in practice, enabling blinding provides an additional layer of protection for devices that may be more susceptible to physical access or side-channel observation.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  5. CVE-2025-7394

    Высокий · CVSS 7EPSS 0,46%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2025-7394

    In the OpenSSL compatibility layer implementation, the function RAND_poll() was not behaving as expected and leading to the potential for predictable values returned from RAND_bytes() after fork() is called. This can lead to weak or predictable random numbers generated in applications that are both using RAND_bytes() and doing fork() operations. This only affects applications explicitly calling RAND_bytes() after fork() and does not affect any internal TLS operations. Although RAND_bytes() documentation in OpenSSL calls out not being safe for use with fork() without first calling RAND_poll(), an additional code change was also made in wolfSSL

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  6. CVE-2025-7395

    Критический · CVSS 9.2EPSS 0,27%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Domain Name Validation Bypass with Apple Native Certificate Validation

    A certificate verification error in wolfSSL when building with the WOLFSSL_SYS_CA_CERTS and WOLFSSL_APPLE_NATIVE_CERT_VALIDATION options results in the wolfSSL client failing to properly verify the server certificate's domain name, allowing any certificate issued by a trusted CA to be accepted regardless of the hostname.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  7. CVE-2024-1545

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,58%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Fault Injection of RSA encryption in WolfCrypt

    Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the RsaKey structure.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  8. CVE-2024-1543

    Средний · CVSS 4.1EPSS 0,18%Нет опубликованного исправления

    AES T-Table sub-cache-line leakage

    The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to break the cache-line-level protection. For details on the attack refer to: https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  9. CVE-2024-1544

    Средний · CVSS 4.1EPSS 0,35%Нет опубликованного исправления

    ECDSA nonce bias caused by truncation

    Generating the ECDSA nonce k samples a random number r and then truncates this randomness with a modular reduction mod n where n is the order of the elliptic curve. Meaning k = r mod n. The division used during the reduction estimates a factor q_e by dividing the upper two digits (a digit having e.g. a size of 8 byte) of r by the upper digit of n and then decrements q_e in a loop until it has the correct size. Observing the number of times q_e is decremented through a control-flow revealing side-channel reveals a bias in the most significant bits of k. Depending on the curve this is either a negligible bias or a significant bias larg

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  10. CVE-2024-5814

    Средний · CVSS 5.1EPSS 0,47%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Unverifed Ciphersuite used on a client-side TLS1.3 Downgrade

    A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  11. CVE-2024-5288

    Средний · CVSS 5.1EPSS 0,42%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Safe-error attack on TLS 1.3 Protocol

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.7.0. A safe-error attack via Rowhammer, namely FAULT+PROBE, leads to ECDSA key disclosure. When WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS is used in signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, the connection is halted if any fault occurs. The success rate in a certain amount of connection requests can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  12. CVE-2024-5991

    Критический · CVSS 10EPSS 0,56%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Buffer overread in domain name matching

    In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  13. CVE-2024-0901

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 0,69%Нет опубликованного исправления

    SEGV and out of bounds memory read from malicious packet

    Remotely executed SEGV and out of bounds read allows malicious packet sender to crash or cause an out of bounds read via sending a malformed packet with the correct length.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  14. CVE-2023-3724

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,65%Нет опубликованного исправления

    TLS 1.3 client issue handling malicious server when not including a KSE and PSK extension

    If a TLS 1.3 client gets neither a PSK (pre shared key) extension nor a KSE (key share extension) when connecting to a malicious server, a default predictable buffer gets used for the IKM (Input Keying Material) value when generating the session master secret. Using a potentially known IKM value when generating the session master secret key compromises the key generated, allowing an eavesdropper to reconstruct it and potentially allowing access to or meddling with message contents in the session. This issue does not affect client validation of connected servers, nor expose private key information, but could result in an insecure TLS 1.3 sessi

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  15. CVE-2022-42905

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 2,08%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-42905

    In wolfSSL before 5.5.2, if callback functions are enabled (via the WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS flag), then a malicious TLS 1.3 client or network attacker can trigger a buffer over-read on the heap of 5 bytes. (WOLFSSL_CALLBACKS is only intended for debugging.)

  16. CVE-2022-42961

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 0,66%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-42961

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. A fault injection attack on RAM via Rowhammer leads to ECDSA key disclosure. Users performing signing operations with private ECC keys, such as in server-side TLS connections, might leak faulty ECC signatures. These signatures can be processed via an advanced technique for ECDSA key recovery. (In 5.5.0 and later, WOLFSSL_CHECK_SIG_FAULTS can be used to address the vulnerability.)

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  17. CVE-2022-39173

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 5,76%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-39173

    In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  18. CVE-2022-38153

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 2,48%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-38153

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0 (when --enable-session-ticket is used); however, only version 5.3.0 is exploitable. Man-in-the-middle attackers or a malicious server can crash TLS 1.2 clients during a handshake. If an attacker injects a large ticket (more than 256 bytes) into a NewSessionTicket message in a TLS 1.2 handshake, and the client has a non-empty session cache, the session cache frees a pointer that points to unallocated memory, causing the client to crash with a "free(): invalid pointer" message. NOTE: It is likely that this is also exploitable during TLS 1.3 handshakes between a client and a malicious server. With

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  19. CVE-2022-38152

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 2,92%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-38152

    An issue was discovered in wolfSSL before 5.5.0. When a TLS 1.3 client connects to a wolfSSL server and SSL_clear is called on its session, the server crashes with a segmentation fault. This occurs in the second session, which is created through TLS session resumption and reuses the initial struct WOLFSSL. If the server reuses the previous session structure (struct WOLFSSL) by calling wolfSSL_clear(WOLFSSL* ssl) on it, the next received Client Hello (that resumes the previous session) crashes the server. Note that this bug is only triggered when resuming sessions using TLS session resumption. Only servers that use wolfSSL_clear instead of the

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  20. CVE-2022-34293

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 1,44%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2022-34293

    wolfSSL before 5.4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via DTLS because a check for return-routability can be skipped.

    Опубликовано Обновлено

Проверьте свой сервер

Сопоставьте установленный стек и версии со свежими базами уязвимостей.

Проверьте свой сервер →