p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Свежие уязвимости

Уязвимости python2.7 · Страница 2

За последние 30 дней в python2.7 опубликовано уязвимостей: 5; в каталоге KEV: 0.

Фильтры уязвимостей
Сбросить фильтры

Уязвимостей: 55

  1. CVE-2026-0864

    Средний · CVSS 4.1EPSS 0,13%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Configuration Injection via Carriage Return (\r) in write() method

    When using the "configparser" module to write configuration files containing multi-line text values with carriage return characters (\r) the resulting file could be injected with unexpected keys and values if the attacker controls the written value.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  2. CVE-2026-11940

    Высокий · CVSS 7.8EPSS 0,75%Нет опубликованного исправления

    tarfile extraction filter bypass allows escaping the destination directory

    tarfile.extractall() with the 'data' or 'tar' filter could be bypassed by a crafted archive where a hardlink references a symlink stored at a deeper name than the hardlink itself.  The extraction fallback validated the symlink at it's archived location but recreated it at the hardlink's shallower path, letting a relative target the filter judged contained escape the destination directory.  This allowed a malicious tar archive to create a symlink pointing outside the destination, enabling out-of-destination file reads or writes. This was an incomplete fix of CVE-2025-4330.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  3. CVE-2026-9669

    Высокий · CVSS 8.2EPSS 0,43%Нет опубликованного исправления

    bz2.BZ2Decompressor reuse after error can cause a stack buffer overflow

    bz2.BZ2Decompressor objects could be reused after a decompression error. If an application caught the resulting OSError and retried with the same decompressor, crafted input could cause the decompressor to resume from an invalid internal state and perform out-of-bounds writes to a stack buffer. This could crash the process when processing untrusted data.

  4. CVE-2026-3276

    Средний · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,49%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Potential DoS via quadratic complexity in unicodedata.normalize()

    unicodedata.normalize() can take excessive CPU time when processing specially crafted Unicode input containing long runs of combining characters with alternating Canonical Combining Class values. This affects all normalization forms.

  5. CVE-2026-8328

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,46%Нет опубликованного исправления

    FTP PASV SSRF, ftpcp() does not use actual peer address, trusts server-supplied PASV host address

    The ftpcp() function in Lib/ftplib.py was not updated when CVE-2021-4189 was fixed. While makepasv() was patched to replace server-supplied PASV host addresses with the actual peer address (getpeername()[0]), ftpcp() still calls parse227() directly and passes the raw attacker-controllable IP address and port to target.sendport(). This patch is related to CVE-2021-4189.

  6. CVE-2026-7210

    Средний · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,67%Нет опубликованного исправления

    The expat and elementtree parsers use insufficient entropy for XML hash-flooding protection

    `xml.parsers.expat` and `xml.etree.ElementTree` use insufficient entropy for Expat hash-flooding protection, which allows a crafted XML document to trigger hash flooding.\r\n\r\nFully mitigating this vulnerability requires both updating libexpat to 2.8.0 or later and applying this patch.

  7. CVE-2026-4786

    Высокий · CVSS 7EPSS 0,29%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Incomplete mitigation of CVE-2026-4519, %action expansion for command injection to webbrowser.open()

    Mitgation of CVE-2026-4519 was incomplete. If the URL contained "%action" the mitigation could be bypassed for certain browser types the "webbrowser.open()" API could have commands injected into the underlying shell. See CVE-2026-4519 for details.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  8. CVE-2026-6100

    Критический · CVSS 9.1EPSS 0,58%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Use-after-free in lzma.LZMADecompressor, bz2.BZ2Decompressor, and gzip.GzipFile after re-use under memory pressure

    Use-after-free (UAF) was possible in the `lzma.LZMADecompressor`, `bz2.BZ2Decompressor`, and `gzip.GzipFile` when a memory allocation fails with a `MemoryError` and the decompression instance is re-used. This scenario can be triggered if the process is under memory pressure. The fix cleans up the dangling pointer in this specific error condition. The vulnerability is only present if the program re-uses decompressor instances across multiple decompression calls even after a `MemoryError` is raised during decompression. Using the helper functions to one-shot decompress data such as `lzma.decompress()`, `bz2.decompress()`, `gzip.decompress()`,

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  9. CVE-2026-3446

    Средний · CVSS 6EPSS 0,19%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Base64 decoding stops at first padded quad by default

    When calling base64.b64decode() or related functions the decoding process would stop after encountering the first padded quad regardless of whether there was more information to be processed. This can lead to data being accepted which may be processed differently by other implementations. Use "validate=True" to enable stricter processing of base64 data.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  10. CVE-2026-4519

    Высокий · CVSS 7EPSS 0,31%Нет опубликованного исправления

    webbrowser.open() allows leading dashes in URLs

    The webbrowser.open() API would accept leading dashes in the URL which could be handled as command line options for certain web browsers. New behavior rejects leading dashes. Users are recommended to sanitize URLs prior to passing to webbrowser.open().

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  11. CVE-2025-13462

    Низкий · CVSS 2EPSS 0,17%Нет опубликованного исправления

    tarfile: Skip DIRTYPE normalization during GNU LONGNAME/LONGLINK handling

    The "tarfile" module would still apply normalization of AREGTYPE (\x00) blocks to DIRTYPE, even while processing a multi-block member such as GNUTYPE_LONGNAME or GNUTYPE_LONGLINK. This could result in a crafted tar archive being misinterpreted by the tarfile module compared to other implementations.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  12. CVE-2025-69534

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 0,6%Нет опубликованного исправления

    CVE-2025-69534

    Python-Markdown version 3.8 contain a vulnerability where malformed HTML-like sequences can cause html.parser.HTMLParser to raise an unhandled AssertionError during Markdown parsing. Because Python-Markdown does not catch this exception, any application that processes attacker-controlled Markdown may crash. This enables remote, unauthenticated Denial of Service in web applications, documentation systems, CI/CD pipelines, and any service that renders untrusted Markdown. The issue was acknowledged by the vendor and fixed in version 3.8.1. This issue causes a remote Denial of Service in any application parsing untrusted Markdown, and can lead to

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  13. CVE-2026-1299

    Средний · CVSS 6EPSS 0,57%Нет опубликованного исправления

    email BytesGenerator header injection due to unquoted newlines

    The email module, specifically the "BytesGenerator" class, didn’t properly quote newlines for email headers when serializing an email message allowing for header injection when an email is serialized. This is only applicable if using "LiteralHeader" writing headers that don't respect email folding rules, the new behavior will reject the incorrectly folded headers in "BytesGenerator".

  14. CVE-2025-12781

    Средний · CVSS 6.3EPSS 0,86%Нет опубликованного исправления

    base64.b64decode() always accepts "+/" characters, despite setting altchars

    When passing data to the b64decode(), standard_b64decode(), and urlsafe_b64decode() functions in the "base64" module the characters "+/" will always be accepted, regardless of the value of "altchars" parameter, typically used to establish an "alternative base64 alphabet" such as the URL safe alphabet. This behavior matches what is recommended in earlier base64 RFCs, but newer RFCs now recommend either dropping characters outside the specified base64 alphabet or raising an error. The old behavior has the possibility of causing data integrity issues. This behavior can only be insecure if your application uses an alternate base64 alphabet (w

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  15. CVE-2025-15367

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,38%Нет опубликованного исправления

    POP3 command injection in user-controlled commands

    The poplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have additional commands injected using newlines. Mitigation rejects commands containing control characters.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  16. CVE-2025-15366

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 0,43%Нет опубликованного исправления

    IMAP command injection in user-controlled commands

    The imaplib module, when passed a user-controlled command, can have additional commands injected using newlines. Mitigation rejects commands containing control characters.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  17. CVE-2025-13837

    Низкий · CVSS 2.1EPSS 0,22%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Out-of-memory when loading Plist

    When loading a plist file, the plistlib module reads data in size specified by the file itself, meaning a malicious file can cause OOM and DoS issues

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  18. CVE-2025-6075

    Низкий · CVSS 1.8EPSS 0,15%Нет опубликованного исправления

    Quadratic complexity in os.path.expandvars() with user-controlled template

    If the value passed to os.path.expandvars() is user-controlled a performance degradation is possible when expanding environment variables.

    Опубликовано Обновлено
  19. CVE-2025-8291

    Средний · CVSS 4.3EPSS 0,47%Нет опубликованного исправления

    ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset not checked

    The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create ZIP archives that are handled differently by the 'zipfile' module compared to other ZIP implementations. Remediation maintains this behavior, but checks that the offset specified in the ZIP64 EOCD Locator record matches the expected value.

Проверьте свой сервер

Сопоставьте установленный стек и версии со свежими базами уязвимостей.

Проверьте свой сервер →