p PatchFirst

PatchFirst · Свежие уязвимости

Уязвимости openssl · Страница 2

За последние 30 дней в openssl опубликовано уязвимостей: 0; в каталоге KEV: 0.

Фильтры уязвимостей
Сбросить фильтры

Уязвимостей: 33

  1. CVE-2019-1549

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 6,18%Есть исправление

    Fork Protection

    OpenSSL 1.1.1 introduced a rewritten random number generator (RNG). This was intended to include protection in the event of a fork() system call in order to ensure that the parent and child processes did not share the same RNG state. However this protection was not being used in the default case. A partial mitigation for this issue is that the output from a high precision timer is mixed into the RNG state so the likelihood of a parent and child process sharing state is significantly reduced. If an application already calls OPENSSL_init_crypto() explicitly using OPENSSL_INIT_ATFORK then this problem does not occur at all. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  2. CVE-2019-1547

    Средний · CVSS 4.7EPSS 1,16%Есть исправление

    ECDSA remote timing attack

    Normally in OpenSSL EC groups always have a co-factor present and this is used in side channel resistant code paths. However, in some cases, it is possible to construct a group using explicit parameters (instead of using a named curve). In those cases it is possible that such a group does not have the cofactor present. This can occur even where all the parameters match a known named curve. If such a curve is used then OpenSSL falls back to non-side channel resistant code paths which may result in full key recovery during an ECDSA signature operation. In order to be vulnerable an attacker would have to have the ability to time the creation of

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  3. CVE-2019-1543

    Высокий · CVSS 7.4EPSS 5,7%Есть исправление

    ChaCha20-Poly1305 with long nonces

    ChaCha20-Poly1305 is an AEAD cipher, and requires a unique nonce input for every encryption operation. RFC 7539 specifies that the nonce value (IV) should be 96 bits (12 bytes). OpenSSL allows a variable nonce length and front pads the nonce with 0 bytes if it is less than 12 bytes. However it also incorrectly allows a nonce to be set of up to 16 bytes. In this case only the last 12 bytes are significant and any additional leading bytes are ignored. It is a requirement of using this cipher that nonce values are unique. Messages encrypted using a reused nonce value are susceptible to serious confidentiality and integrity attacks. If an applica

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.2
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  4. CVE-2018-5407

    Средний · CVSS 4.7EPSS 3,42%Публичный эксплойтЕсть исправление

    CVE-2018-5407

    Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'.

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  5. CVE-2018-0734

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 12,15%Есть исправление

    Timing attack against DSA

    The OpenSSL DSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2q (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2p).

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  6. CVE-2018-0735

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 4,72%Есть исправление

    Timing attack against ECDSA signature generation

    The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1).

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  7. CVE-2018-0495

    Средний · CVSS 4.7EPSS 0,87%Есть исправление

    CVE-2018-0495

    Libgcrypt before 1.7.10 and 1.8.x before 1.8.3 allows a memory-cache side-channel attack on ECDSA signatures that can be mitigated through the use of blinding during the signing process in the _gcry_ecc_ecdsa_sign function in cipher/ecc-ecdsa.c, aka the Return Of the Hidden Number Problem or ROHNP. To discover an ECDSA key, the attacker needs access to either the local machine or a different virtual machine on the same physical host.

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.1
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  8. CVE-2018-0732

    Высокий · CVSS 7.5EPSS 47,01%Есть исправление

    Client DoS due to large DH parameter

    During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o).

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.1
  9. CVE-2018-0737

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 11,6%Есть исправление

    Cache timing vulnerability in RSA Key Generation

    The OpenSSL RSA Key generation algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a cache timing side channel attack. An attacker with sufficient access to mount cache timing attacks during the RSA key generation process could recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2o).

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.1
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  10. CVE-2018-0739

    Средний · CVSS 6.5EPSS 18,6%Есть исправление

    Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition could exceed the stack

    Constructed ASN.1 types with a recursive definition (such as can be found in PKCS7) could eventually exceed the stack given malicious input with excessive recursion. This could result in a Denial Of Service attack. There are no such structures used within SSL/TLS that come from untrusted sources so this is considered safe. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0h (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0g). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2o (Affected 1.0.2b-1.0.2n).

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu3
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  11. CVE-2017-3738

    Средний · CVSS 5.9EPSS 13,41%Есть исправление

    CVE-2017-3738

    There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, whi

    • Обновитесь до 1.1.0g-2ubuntu3
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  12. CVE-2017-3736

    Средний · CVSS 6.5EPSS 10,13%Есть исправление

    CVE-2017-3736

    There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0g. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally nee

    • Обновитесь до 1.0.2g-1ubuntu14
    Опубликовано Обновлено
  13. CVE-2017-3735

    Средний · CVSS 5.3EPSS 20,97%Есть исправление

    CVE-2017-3735

    While parsing an IPAddressFamily extension in an X.509 certificate, it is possible to do a one-byte overread. This would result in an incorrect text display of the certificate. This bug has been present since 2006 and is present in all versions of OpenSSL before 1.0.2m and 1.1.0g.

    • Обновитесь до 1.0.2g-1ubuntu14
    Опубликовано Обновлено

Проверьте свой сервер

Сопоставьте установленный стек и версии со свежими базами уязвимостей.

Проверьте свой сервер →